True Prime Pairs
This is the partial of the mapping scheme of our eQuantum Project. Our mapping is simulating a recombination of the three (3) layers of these prime pairs.
This section is referring to wiki page2 of zone section2 that is inherited from the zone section2 by prime spin and span with the partitions as below.
 True Prime Pairs
 Primes Platform
 Pairwise Scenario
 Power of Magnitude
 The Pairwise Disjoint
 The Prime Recycling ζ(s)
 Implementation in Physics
An Independent claim is also included for the localization and determination, or their material structures, by graphical representation of base sequences on various media, based on the new assignments and the derived vibrations and amplitudes.
Prime Objects
In short this project is mapping the quantum way within a huge of prime objects (5 to 19) by lexering (11) the ungrammared feed (7) and parsering (13) across syntax (17).
5, 2, 1, 0
7, 3, 1, 0
11, 4, 1, 0
13, 5, 1, 0
17, 0, 1, 1
19, 1, 1, 1
The 5+7+11+13 is the smallest square number expressible as the sum of four consecutive primes which are also two couples of prime twins!
 Their sum is 36 which is the smallest square that is the sum of a twin prime pair {17, 19}.
 This 36 is the smallest number expressible as the sum of consecutive prime in two (2) ways (5+7+11+13 and 17+19).
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer i  f
++
 1  5
1 ++
 2  7
++ } 36 » 6®
 3  11
2 ++
 4  13
++
 5  17
3 ++ } 36 » 6®
 6  19
++
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer  node  sub  i  f
+++
   1 
  1 ++
 1   2  (5)
 ++
   3 
1 ++ 2 ++
   4 
 +++
 2   5  (7)
  3 ++
   6 
++++ } (36)
   7 
  4 ++
 3   8  (11)
 +++
   9 
2 + 5 ++
   10 
 ++
 4   11  (13)
  6 ++
   12 
++++
   13 
  7 ++
 5   14  (17)
 ++
   15 
3 ++ 8 ++ } (36)
   16 
 ++
 6   17  (19)
  9 ++
   18 
++
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer  node  sub  i  f
+++
   1  
  1 ++ 
 1   2  (5) 
 ++ 
   3  
1 ++ 2 ++ 
   4  
 +++ 
 2   5  (7) 
  3 ++ 
   6  11s
++++ } (36) 
   7  
  4 ++ 
 3   8  (11) 
 +++ 
   9  
2 + 5 ++ 
   10  
 ++ 
 4   11  (13) 
  6 ++ < strip √
   12 
++++ 
   13  
  7 ++ 
 5   14  (17) 
 ++ 
   15  7s = f(1000)
3 ++ 8 ++ } (36) 
   16  
 ++ 
 6   17  (19) 
  9 ++ 
   18  
++#
We consider a certain theory of 3forms in 7 dimensions, and study its dimensional reduction to 4D, compactifying the 7dimensional manifold on the 3sphere of a fixed radius.
 We show that the resulting 4D theory is (Riemannian) General Relativity (GR) in Plebanski formulation, modulo corrections that are negligible for curvatures smaller than Planckian.
 Possibly the most interesting point of this construction is that the dimensionally reduced theory is GR with a nonzero cosmological constant, and the value of the cosmological constant is directly related to the size of . Realistic values of Λ correspond to of Planck size.
In our approach a 3form is not an object that exist in addition to the metric, it is the only object that exist. The metric, and in particular the 4D metric, is defined by the 3form. (General relativity from threeforms in seven dimensions  pdf)
In this article we will support this conjecture and develop a new approach to quantum gravity called smooth quantum gravity by using smooth 4manifolds with an exotic smoothness structure.
 In particular we discuss the appearance of a wildly embedded 3manifold which we identify with a quantum state.
 Furthermore, we analyze this quantum state by using foliation theory and relate it to an element in an operator algebra.
 Then we describe a set of geometric, noncommutative operators, the skein algebra, which can be used to determine the geometry of a 3manifold.
 This operator algebra can be understood as a deformation quantization of the classical Poisson algebra of observables given by holonomies.
 The structure of this operator algebra induces an action by using the quantized calculus of Connes.
The scaling behavior of this action is analyzed to obtain the classical theory of General Relativity (GRT) for large scales. (Smooth quantum gravity  pdf)
The holonomy tells you how to propagate MEC30. A spin network state assigns an amplitude to a set of spin half particles tracing out a path in space, merging and splitting.
This kind of approach has some obvious properties: there are nonlinear gravitons, a connection to lattice gauge field theory and a dimensional reduction from 4D to 2D.
Construction of a State
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer  node  sub  i  f
+++ < Mobius strip √
   1  
  1 ++ 
 1   2  (5) 
 ++ 
   3  
1 ++ 2 ++ 
   4  
 +++ 
 2   5  (7) 
  3 ++ 
   6  11s
++++ } (36) 
   7  
  4 ++ 
 3   8  (11) 
 +++ 
   9  
2 + 5 ++ 
   10  
 ++ 
 4   11  (13) 
  6 ++ < Mobius strip
   12 
++++ 
   13  
  7 ++ 
 5   14  (17) 
 ++ 
   15  7s = f(1000)
3 ++ 8 ++ } (36) 
   16  
 ++ 
 6   17  (19) 
  9 ++ 
   18  
++ < Möbius strip √
The funny looking Möbius strip, which was also independently discovered in 1858 by the unlucky Listing whose name left the history of mathematics untouched.
 It is a surface with only one side and only one boundary, often used to puzzle young math students. You can easily create it by taking a strip of paper, twisting it and then joining the ends of the strip.

Being the first example of a surface without orientation it did not shake the grounds of mathematics as much as the other discoveries of this list did, yet it provided a lot of practical applications, such as a resistant belt, and inspired mathematicians to come up with unorientable surfaces, like the Klein bottle.
 The name of this surface possibly comes from a double coincidence: Klein, its conceptor, originally named it Fläche, which means surface in German and sounds similar to Flasche, which means bottle. The fact that it also looked like a bottle seems to have sealed the renaming.
Mathematical fields were created, we got the Turing Machine, fancy looking surfaces and, most importantly, the ability to reexamine our perceptions and adapt our tools accordingly. (freeCodeCamp)
These items are elementary parts possessing familiar properties but they never exist as free particles. Instead they join together by the strong force into bound states.
f(18) = f(7) + f(11) = (1+7+29) + 11th prime = 37 + 31 = 36 + 32 = 68
Bilateral 9 Sums
Eigennvalue curves (right) showing a triple eigenvalue at zero for τ = 1 and double eigenvalues at 1 ± √2i for τ = √43. On the left the graph of 1/Q(λ) with the same eigenvalue curves plotted in the ground plane. Green stars indicate the eigenvalues of A, blue stars the roots of puv(λ) and triangles the zeroes of Q0(λ)
10 + 10th prime + 10th prime = 10 + 29 + 29 = 68
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer  node  sub  i  f
+++ < Mobius strip
   1  
  1 ++ 
 1   2  (5) 
 ++ 
   3  
1 ++ 2 ++ 
   4  
 +++ 
 2   5  (7) 
  3 ++ 
   6  11s ‹ (71) √
++++ } (36) 
   7  
  4 ++ 
 3   8  (11) 
 +++ 
   9  
2 + 5 ++ 
   10  
 ++ 
 4   11  (13) 
  6 ++ < Mobius strip
   12 
++++ 
   13  
  7 ++ 
 5   14  (17) 
 ++ 
   15  7s ‹ (43) √
3 ++ 8 ++ } (36) 
   16  
 ++ 
 6   17  (19) 
  9 ++ 
   18  
++ < Möbius strip
This pattern is raised up per six (6) cycles on the 19, 43 and 71. Since the members are limited to the sum of 43+71=114.
So here the bilateral way of 19 that originated by the (Δ1) is clearly the one that controls the scheme.
In the matrix pictured below, we list the first 24 elements of our domain, take their squares, calculate the modulo 90 congruence and digital roots of each square, and display the digital root factorization dyad for each square (and map their collective bilateral 9 sum symmetry). (PrimesDemystified)
7 x π(89) = 7 x 24 = 168 = π(1000)
Supersymmetric Multiplet
$True Prime Pairs:
(5,7), (11,13), (17,19)
layer  node  sub  i  f. MEC 30 / 2
++++ ‹ 0 {1/2}
   1  
  1 ++ 
 1   2  (5) 
 ++ 
   3  
1 ++ 2 ++ 
   4  
 +++ 
 2   5  (7) 
  3 ++ 
   6  11s ‹ ∆28 = (7143) √
++++ } (36) 
   7  
  4 ++ 
 3   8  (11) 
 +++ 
   9 ‹ ∆9 = (8971) / 2 √ 
2 + 5* ++ 
   10  
 ++ 
 4   11  (13) 
  6 ++ ‹ 15 {0}
   12 
++++ 
   13  
  7 ++ 
 5   14  (17) 
 ++ 
   15  7s ‹ ∆24 = (4319) √
3* ++ 8 ++ } (36) 
   16  
 ++ 
 6   17  (19) 
  9 ++ 
   18  
++ ‹ 30 {+1/2}
Given our domain is limited to numbers ≌ {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29} modulo 30, only ϕ(m)/m = 8/30 or 26.66% of natural numbers N = {0, 1, 2, 3, …} need be sieved.
 For example, to illustrate the proportionality of this ratio, we find that 25% of the first 100 natural numbers are prime, while 72% of numbers not divisible by 2, 3, or 5 are prime (and, curiously, if we count 2, 3, and 5 in after the fact, we get 75%, or exactly 3 x 25%).
 Also note that if you plug the number 30 into Euler’s totient function, phi(n): phi(30)= 8, with the 8 integers (known as totatives) smaller than and having no factors in common with 30 being: 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23 and 29, i.e., what are called “prime roots” above. Thirty is the largest integer with this property.]
 The integer 30, product of the first three prime numbers (2, 3 and 5), and thus a primorial, plays a powerful role organizing the array’s perfect symmetry, viz., in the case of the 8 prime roots:
1+29=30; 7+23=30; 11+19=30; and 13+17=30.
 In The Number Mysteries wellknown mathematician Marcus Du Sautoy writes: “In the world of mathematics, the numbers 2, 3, and 5 are like hydrogen, helium, and lithium. That’s what makes them the most important numbers in mathematics.”
 Although 2, 3 and 5 are the only prime numbers not included in the domain under discussion, they are nonetheless integral to it: First of all, they sieve out roughly 73% of all natural numbers, leaving only those nominally necessary to construct a geometry within which prime numbers can be optimally arrayed.
 The remaining 26.66% (to be a bit more precise) constituting the array can be constructed with an elegantly simple interchangeable expression (or power series, if you prefer) that incorporates the first three primes. It’s conjectured that this manifold series ultimately consists of all (and only) the numbers not divisible by 2, 3, or 5 (and their negatives), which inclues all prime numbers >5 (more below under the heading “Conjectures and Facts Relating to the Prime Spiral Sieve”).
What is critical to understand, is that the invisible hand of 2, 3 and 5, and their factorial 30, create the structure within which the balance of the prime numbers, i.e., all those greater than 5, are arrayed algorithmically–as we shall demonstrate. Primes 2, 3 and 5 play out in modulo 306090 cycles (decomposing to {3,6,9} sequencing at the digital root level). Once the role of 2, 3 and 5 is properly understood, all else falls beautifully into place. (PrimesDemystified)